Concerns or comments? Contact us at:         saveourschoharie@yahoo.com

• Status report 27 July 2007 (MS Word doc)

• Talking points

• SOS experts' technical testimony:

— Sound monitoring

— Air monitoring

• Text of SOS Petition
  And Expert Testimony

   

IMPORTANT MEETING OF SCHOHARIE TOWN BOARD The next Schoharie Town Board meeting will be held Wednesday September 28, 2011 at 7PM.  This month’s meeting is scheduled to address issues related to recent developments in quarry and natural gas operations.  If you are concerned about the impacts of mining on the Town of Schoharie, please make every effort to attend and to alert people about The Town Board meeting.

THE MEETING IS THIS COMING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28th, STARTING AT 7:00 pm. IT WILL BE HELD AT THE JACK MILLER BUILDING (the old New Holland Tractor place near the Old Stone Fort, 114 Fort Road, Schoharie, north of the Post Office)

THE  ISSUES:

1. Following a ruling byJudge Devine last Spring, the Town Board intends to enter into compromise negotiations with Cobleskill Stone Products officials. The issue to be addressed at Wednesday's Meeting is the need for the Town Board to obtain direct and specific input and guidance from Town Residents, preferably conducting a Town Straw Poll, BEFORE entering into negotiations or taking any further action.

2.  Most residents are not aware that hundreds of acres in the Town of Schoharie have already been leased for natural gas exploration and drilling (commonly known as 'hydro-fracking'). The recent large East Coast earthquake centered in Virginia and the more recent tragic flooding from Irene highlight the extremely serious safety issues connected to hydrofracking.  The issue to be addressed is the rationale and the urgency for following the lead of many nearby Towns, including Oneonta, Cooperstown, Cherry Valley and Richmondville, and passing land use laws which will effectively put a hold on hydrofracking until such time as safety issues are properly addressed. Also on the agenda are road use protection regulations.

Click here for Agrument to Ban Hydrofraking

Click here for Case Against Hydrofraking

______________________________________________

In The News. "Quarry owner owes public answers on Howe Caverns project" from Schenectady Gazette. read more  

SOS Newsletter.  "Living on the edge, not by choice",  "Where do we stand", commentary from new residents, photos of quarry blast dust settling over school grounds, more (10/09). current issue

Study Shows fugitive dust migrating to school & elsewhere

At the public hearing in June of 2007, Schoharie residents, a handful of school teachers, and an individual who had worked on the school’s severely clogged air filtration system all expressed concerns regarding what they viewed as adverse health impacts potentially or actually being caused by fugitive dust escaping from Cobleskill Stone Products’ (CSP) Schoharie quarry.

SOS followed up on these concerns by contacting the Region 4 NY State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to see if any air quality studies of the quarry had been conducted and, if so, what the findings were. David Picket, of DEC’s Division of Air, indicated that he had indeed recently inspected CSP’s Schoharie quarry. He admits, however, the day of his inspection machinery was shut down for maintenance, so quarry activity was not typical.

Mr. Picket further said that his interpretation of DEC policy is that he should assess emissions only from stationary sources. He explained that mobile sources of fugitive dust coming from heavy truck traffic, drilling, blasting, and earth-moving equipment are not regulated nor inspected by his department. So, in sum, the inspection observed a quarry whose stationary machinery was idle, and ignored some of the largest producers of dust coming from the facility.

Earlier, when CSP first applied for a DEC permit to expand, SOS had requested that air monitoring or modeling be conducted during the Environmental Impact Study, but DEC deemed CSP’s application complete without conducting such assessments.

Since the regional DEC appeared disinclined to further examine the issue of fugitive dust, SOS decided to undertake air quality monitoring on its own. Bob Montione, SOS vice-chairman and an environmental scientist with 27 years experience, under the direction of John Hinckley, of Resource Systems Group’s Environment Division, set up dust monitors around the community for about three weeks.  Mr. Montione also arranged for laboratory analysis of a dust sample previously collected from the school be a former teacher.

Data from these tests indicate the following:

Fugitive dust from the CSP facility is clearly migrating to adjoining properties, including Schoharie Central School and likely the nearby senior citizens apartment complex.

During CSP’s working hours, the concentrations of dust on adjoining properties were sometimes higher than NYS Air Guidance concentrations for fugitive dust when measured as an hourly average.  These guidance values and federal regulations are compared on various time scales (e.g., average for one hour, average for 24 hours, average for one year). Based on reasonable silica percentages of 4-20 percent, the daily average concentrations of dust may be exceeding NYS DEC Air Guidance Concentration (annual average) for silica.

After the single blast event captured during the testing, dust concentrations on an adjacent property increased sevenfold for a low intensity blast located 2,000 feet from the property line.  Logically, the increase in dust distribution from a more typical blast, located closer to the quarry’s property line (25 feet is the minimum setback) would produce even high concentrations of dust.

The increases in dust concentrations measured at adjacent properties were similar to those that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded would be likely to have adverse effects on human health.

SOS recently sent a report detailing the findings of the fugitive dust study to the NYS Department of Health for that agency’s review.

Newsletter Vol.3, No. 1 (10/09)

Newsletter Vol. 2, No. 4 (12/08)

Newsletter Vol. 2, No. 3 (03/08)

Newsletter Vol. 2, No. 2 (11/07)

CSP Application Deemed ‘Complete’

Revised CSP Proposal and SOS Response

More Evidence From the Camera

LINKS